01 / Project

AI-assisted decision-support experience

ClearStep

Helps people navigate unfamiliar systems by turning confusing messages and information into clear next-step decisions.

Context
Graduate design coursework · 2026
My Role
Solo Product & Interaction Designer
Outcome
Validated interaction prototype
Real prototype: message input, focused follow-up, and structured guidance

01 / Problem

Understanding the message was not enough.

The problem was not translation. It was decision effort.

People can receive a bank notice, form prompt, or unfamiliar instruction and understand the words while still being unable to answer three practical questions: Does this apply to me? Is action required? What should I do next?

Existing workarounds often added explanation without reducing the decision. ClearStep reframed the task around moving from uncertain information to a confident next action.

02 / Insight

Action matters more than more information.

Research and prototype work showed that users valued a clear action more than additional explanation. That changed the product from a general interpretation tool into an action-first decision-support experience.

Decision confidence4.17 → 4.83

Average confidence in archived prototype validation.

Full-confidence answers10 → 25

Out of 30 task answers in the same validation.

Main learningAction first

Users preferred a next step over extra explanation.

03 / Scope

Support the decision. Keep the person in control.

In scope

Interpret context

Identify important information and what it means for the immediate task.

In scope

Ask when needed

Request one focused detail rather than guessing through uncertainty.

Out of scope

Automatic action

No risky task execution, hidden judgment, or removal of user control.

04 / Solution

A short path from message to next step.

The experience begins with the task, not a blank AI prompt. The system uses provided information, asks for one missing detail only when necessary, and returns guidance in a stable structure.

Choose a task
Paste information
One focused follow-up
Verdict · Reason · Action

05 / Key decisions

Three decisions shaped the system.

01

Task-first entry

People often know they need help before they know how to describe the problem.

02

One focused follow-up

When an important fact is missing, the system asks instead of manufacturing certainty.

03

Verdict / Reason / Action

Judgment, explanation, and next step stay separate and easy to scan.

06 / Testing

Iteration focused on comprehension and confidence.

Interviews, card sorting, information-architecture evaluation, Wizard of Oz validation, and prototype testing were used at different stages. The work was not a single visual pass: labels, privacy guidance, follow-up behavior, and the result hierarchy changed in response to evidence.

The most important result was behavioral: users could identify whether action was required and what to do next with more confidence.

07 / Outcome

A validated interaction system—not a production claim.

I owned the research, problem framing, product strategy, information architecture, interaction design, AI behavior, prototyping, testing, iteration, and final communication.

The current outcome demonstrates how uncertainty can be handled responsibly through a predictable interaction. Production infrastructure, model engineering, and commercial deployment remain outside the completed work.

Next projectCuePoint